Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of a universal adhesive system to enamel surrounding real-life carious cavities. Twenty-eight permanent molars (n = 7) with carious lesions in dentin were subjected to selective carious tissue removal to firm dentin and had their crowns sectioned longitudinally. A universal adhesive system (Single Bond Universal [SBU] used in either etch-and-rinse and self-etch strategies) was compared with an etch-and-rinse Adper Single Bond 2 (ASB) and a self-etch Clearfil SE Bond (CSE) adhesive systems (control systems). Adhesives were applied on the enamel, assumed demineralized, surrounding the cavity margins and on sound enamel (control substrate). Composite cylinders were built (0.72 mm2) and microshear bond strength (µSBS) test was performed after 24 h of water storage. The µSBS values (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests (α = 0.05). Bond strength values obtained in demineralized enamel surrounding carious cavity margins were significantly lower than that obtained in sound enamel (distant from carious cavity margins) (p = 0.035). The bonding strategy of the SBU did not influenced the bond strength values, which were higher than that obtained with ASB. CSE showed similar µSBS values to ASB and SBU in the self-etch mode. In conclusion, the bond strength to enamel assumed demineralized is lower than to sound enamel. The enamel surrounding carious cavities jeopardize the bonding of universal adhesive system. The bond strength of universal adhesive is similar, regardless to bonding strategy.

Abstract This study aimed to compare the longevity of different conventional restorative materials placed in posterior primary teeth. This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016035775). A comprehensive electronic search without date or language restrictions was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) and Clinical Trials databases up to January 2017, selecting randomized clinical trials that assessed the longevity of at least two different conventional restorative materials performed in primary molars. Seventeen studies were included in this systematic review. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed and relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. Restorations of primary molars with conventional glass ionomer cement showed increased risk of failure than compomer, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, amalgam, and composite resin. Risk of bias was low in most studies (45.38% of all items across studies). Pediatric dentists should avoid conventional glass ionomer cement for restoring primary molars.

Este estudo in vitro avaliou a influência de dois dispositivos para aplicação de força de cisalhamento em testes de resistência de união ao microcisalhamento e no padrão de fratura em dentina e esmalte de dentes decíduos. Oitenta molares decíduos foram selecionados e superficies planas em esmalte (40 dentes seccionados no sentido mésio-distal) e dentina (40 dentes seccionados transversalmente) foram obtidas. Ambas as superficies foram abrasionadas para padronização da lama dentinária. Dois sistemas adesivos de condicionamento ácido prévio (Adper Single Bond e XP Bond) foram utilizados. Tubos de polietileno foram colocados sobre as superficies, nas quais já haviam sido aplicados os sistemas adesivos, e preenchidos com resina composta. O teste de resistência de união ao microcisalhamento foi realizado após armazenamento dos espécimes em água (24 h/37 °C) utilizando dois dispositivos para a aplicação das forças de cisalhamento: cisalha côncava (Bisco Shear Bond Tester) e cisalha plana (Kratos Industrial Equipment). O padrão de fratura foi avaliado usando estereomicroscópio. Os dados de resistência de união foram submetidos à ANOVA e o teste quiquadrado foi utilizado para comparar a distribuição dos padrões de fratura (α=0,05). Não foram observadas diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre os grupos, tanto para a resistência de união a dentina e esmalte quanto para o padrão de fratura (p>0,05). O modo de falha predominante foi adesiva/mista. Em conclusão, os dispositivos para aplicação de força de cisalhamento não influenciam os valores de resistência de união, independente do sistema adesivo e substrato.

This in vitro study evaluated the influence of two devices for application of shear load in microshear tests on bond strength and fracture pattern of primary enamel and dentin. Eighty primary molars were selected and flat enamel (40 teeth sectioned mesio-distally) and dentin (40 teeth sectioned transversally) surfaces were obtained. Both surfaces were polished to standardize the smear layer. Two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive systems (Adper Single Bond and XP Bond) were used. Polyethylene tubes was placed over the bonded surfaces and filled with composite resin. The microshear testing was performed after storage in water (24 h/37 °C) using two devices for application of microshear loads: a notched rod (Bisco Shear Bond Tester) or a knife edge (Kratos Industrial Equipment). Failure modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Bond strength data were subjected to ANOVA and chi-square test to compare the failure mode distributions (α=0.05). No significant differences were observed between the groups for dentin and enamel bond strength or fracture patterns (p>0.05). The predominant failure mode was adhesive/mixed. In conclusion, the devices for application of shear loads did not influence the bond strength values, regardless of adhesive system and substrate.

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the degradation of resin-dentin bonds of an etch-and-rinse adhesive system to primary and permanent teeth. Flat superficial coronal dentin surfaces from 5 primary second molars and 5 permanent third molars were etched with phosphoric acid and bonded with an adhesive system (Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE). Blocks of resin composite (Z250, 3M ESPE) were built up and the teeth sectioned to produce bonded sticks with a 0.8 mm² cross-sectional area. The sticks of each tooth were randomly divided and assigned to be subjected to microtensile testing immediately (24 h) or after aging by water storage (6 months). Data were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05). Failure mode was evaluated using a stereomicroscope (400×). Microtensile values significantly decreased after the 6 months aging, independent of the dentin substrate. In 24 h, the values obtained to primary dentin were lower compared with permanent dentin. This difference was not maintained after aging. Adhesive/mixed failure was predominant in all experimental groups. In conclusion, degradation of resin-dentin bonds of the etch-and-rinse adhesive system occurred after 6 months of water storage; however, the reduction in bond strength values was higher for permanent teeth.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito do digluconato de clorexidina (CHX) a 2% na resistência de união imediata de adesivo convencional à dentina decídua hígida (H) e afetada pela lesão de cárie (CA) comparada à dentina permanente. Superfícies dentinárias planas de 20 molares decíduos (Dec) e 20 molares permanentes (Perm) foram divididas em 8 grupos experimentais (n=5) de acordo com o tipo de dente (Dec ou Perm), condição da dentina (H ou CA - ciclagem de pH por 14 dias) e tratamento (controle - C ou CHX - aplicação por 60 s de solução de digluconato de clorexidina a 2% após condicionamento ácido). O sistema adesivo (Adper Single Bond 2) foi aplicado de acordo com as instruções do fabricante, seguido da aplicação de resina composta (Filtek Z250). Após 24 h de armazenamento em água, espécimes com área de secção transversal de 0,8 mm² foram preparados para o teste de microtração (1 mm/min). Os dados foram submetidos à Análise de Variância e teste de Tukey para comparações múltiplas (α=0,05). Modo de falha foi avaliado usando estereomicroscópio com aumento de 400×. Tratamento com CHX não resultou em maiores valores de resistência de união do que sem pré-tratamento (C grupos), independente do tipo de dente. Dentes decíduos e dentina afetada apresentaram menores médias de resistência de união em comparação a dentes permanentes e dentina hígida, respectivamente (p<0,05). Predomínio de falha adesiva/mista foi observado para todos os grupos. CHX não influenciou a resistência de união imediata à dentina hígida ou afetada pela lesão de cárie de dentes decíduos e permanentes

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) on immediate bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive to sound (SD) and caries-affected (CAD) primary dentin compared with permanent dentin. Flat dentin surfaces from 20 primary molars (Pri) and 20 permanent molars (Perm) were assigned to 8 experimental groups (n=5) according to tooth type (Pri or Perm), dentin condition (SD or CAD - pH-cycling for 14 days) and treatment (control - C or 60 s application of 2% CHX solution after acid etching - CHX). The bonding system (Adper Single Bond 2) was applied according to manufacturer's instructions followed by resin composite application (Filtek Z250). After 24 h water storage, specimens with cross-section area of 0.8 mm² were prepared for being tested under microtensile test (1 mm/min). Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α=0.05). Failure mode was evaluated using a stereomicroscope at ×400. Treatment with CHX did not result in higher bond strength values than no pre-treatment (C groups), independently of tooth type. Primary teeth and caries-affected dentin showed significantly lower (p<0.05) bond strength means compared with permanent teeth and sound dentin, respectively. Predominance of adhesive/mixed failure was observed for all groups. CHX did not influence the immediate bond strength to sound or caries-affected dentin of primary and permanent teeth.